Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Investigating the Effects of Synchronous and Asynchronous Teacher Electronic Feedback on EFL Learners’ Syntactic Complexity in Online Writing

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the impacts of teacher electronic feedback (TEF) on syntactic complexity of online writing produced by advanced English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners. A total of 180 argumentative essays were written by 33 advanced EFL learners in a language institute in Zanjan, Iran. The learners were randomly assigned to two experimental groups and a control group, with twelve learners receiving synchronous TEF, and twelve learners receiving asynchronous TEF. Eight measures of complexity were used to calculate the learners’ syntactic complexity. For data analysis, a series of one-way ANOVAs and two-way ANOVAs were performed to respectively ensure the participants’ homogeneity prior to treatment and analyze the development of syntactic complexity over time. The results indicated that synchronous TEF provided through video conferencing and text chats significantly improved the production of compound-complex sentences and longer noun phrases, while asynchronous TEF using Microsoft Word track changes had only a significant effect on the length of noun phrases. The findings indicate that synchronous and asynchronous TEF can be effective in increasing learners' syntactic complexity, and that combining both strategies may be the most effective approach for teachers to provide feedback in online writing classes.
Keywords
Subjects

Abuseileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning and Technology, 18, 76-95.
Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58-71.
Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 2020, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. Dimensions of L2 performance and
proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 32, 21-46.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
Casal, J. E., & Lee, J. J. (2019). Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51-62.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Chang, C., Cunningham, K., Satar, M., & Strobl, C. (2018). Electronic feedback on second language writing: A retrospective and prospective essay on multimodality. Writing & Pedagogy, 9, 405-428. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.32515
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Teacher written feedback on English as a foreign language learners’ writing: Examining native and nonnative English-speaking teachers’ practices in feedback provision [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, e 629921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629921
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66-79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
Fazilatfar, A., Fallah, N., Hamavandi, M., & Rostamian, M. (2014). The Effect of Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of L2 Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.443
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201.
Ha, M. J. (2022). Syntactic complexity in EFL writing: Within-genre topic and writing quality. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 23(1), 187-205. 
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466
Hussien, M., McGahan, P., Indurkhya, B., Kaneko, K., & Nakagawa, M. (2021). Effects of synchronized and asynchronized e-feedback interactions on academic writing, achievement motivation and critical thinking. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 13, 290–315. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.016
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N., & Kearns, D. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33, 2577-2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x
Jiang, J., Bi, P., & Liu, H. (2019). Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, e100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
Jin, C., Lin, J., & Jiang, L. (2016). Corrective feedback in SLA: Theoretical relevance and empirical research. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p85
Joughin, G. (2009). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1- 4020-8905-3
Kataoka, Y., Thamrin, A. H., & Van Meter, R. (2024). The effect of teacher electronic feedback on Japanese SFL basic learners’ speaking improvement. Journal of Information Processing32, 331-345. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.32.331
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Laredo. https://books.google.com/books?id=fsrYPgAACAAJ
Li, J., & Barnard, R. (2011). Academic tutors’ beliefs about and practices of giving feedback on students’ written assignments: A New Zealand case study. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.004
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, e100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
Martínez, H. A. C. (2018). Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3-15.
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2012). Viewpoint level 1 teacher’s edition with assessment audio CD/CD-ROM. Cambridge University Press.
Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Oktay, S. A., & Öcal, S. D. (2023). Dosing criticism with praise: E-feedback in L2 student writing. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 20(52), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1243002            
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 726-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1336042
Savaşçı, M., & Akçor, G. (2023). Multimodal technology-mediated feedback in second language writing classes through screen casting. In Yangın-Ekşi, G., Akayoglu, S., & Anyango, L. (eds) New directions in technology for writing instruction (pp. 107-122). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_6
Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
Tan, S., Cho, Y. W., & Xu, W. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner’s writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments31(10), 7276–7286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2066137
Taskiran, A., Yazici, M., & Aydin, I. E. (2024). Contribution of automated feedback to the English writing competence of distance foreign language learners. E-Learning and Digital Media21(1), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221139579
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Valizadeh, M., & Soltanpour, F. (2021). Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary English learners’ written syntactic complexity. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911207 
Valizadeh, M. (2020). The effect of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ written syntactic accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.17. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/6099
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53-67.
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System, 97, 102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427