Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

“Simply Lemonade, Honestly Simple”: A Comparative Study of Persuasive Language in English and Persian TV Advertisements

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
Knowing that advertising discourse might vary cross-culturally, this study qualitatively investigated English and Persian TV advertisements with regard to the realization of persuasive language. The data were recorded from global TV channels for a period of one month and, following the Systemic Functional Grammar, the appraisal framework was the analytical tool grounding the data analysis. The data were categorized and then the representations of the evaluative resources via persuasive strategies were distinguished. As the findings of the study revealed, Persian TV advertisements tend to employ repetition and explanation through instances of appreciation, monoglossic positions and representations of force while English advertisements exploit more diverse strategies through different appraisal resources. Accordingly, it is argued that compared to English TV advertisements, Persian advertisements pursue a pattern in which they manifest less variety and creativity.
Keywords
Subjects

A’Beckett, L. (2010). Appraisal in the Russian press: The characteristics of the Ukrainian leaders. Revista Electronicade Linguistica Aplicada, 8, 102-119.
Barker, C., & Galasinski, D. (2001). Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity. Sage Publications.
Bell Media. (2015). 2014/2015 Canadian television report card: Canada’s most-watched specialty channels. Retrieved from http://www.bellmedia.ca/pr/press/20142015-canadian-television-report-card-canadas-watched-specialty-channels/
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Borg, G. (2009). Persuasion: The art of influencing people. FT Press.
Chattrjee, M. (2008). Textual engagement of a different kind? Bridging Discourses: ASFLA 2007 Online Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.asfla.org.au/category/asfla2007/2007appraisal/
Dattamajumdar, S. (2006). The linguistic patterns of advertising text: A study in Kolkata. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 222-229.
Ejupi, V., Siljanovska, L. & Iseni, A. (2014). The mass media and persuasion. European Scientific Journal, 10(14), 636-646.
Fars News Agency (2015). Most-watched Iranian TV channels. Retrieved from http://www.farsnews.com/printable.php?nn=13921214000573
García-Pastor, M. D. (2005). A politeness view of persuasion in ESL/EFL. Lenguaje y Textos, 23, 45-57.
Gebhardt, F. (2010). English pronunciation. Facultad de Filosofía.
Goddard, A. (1998). The language of advertising: Written texts. Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (2009). Continuum companion to systemic functional
linguistics. Continuum.
Hogan, K. (1998). The psychology of persuasion: How to persuade others to your way of thinking. Pelican Pub. Co.
Hood, S., & Martin, J. R. (2007). Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In R., Hasan, C., Matthiessen, & J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 739-764). Equinox.
Huggard, R., Keaney, L., & Breuer, I. (2006). Insight outcomes English year 12. Insight Publications Pty Ltd.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). The rhetoric of Persian and English advertisements. The International
Journal of Language Society and Culture, 30, 25-39.
Jalilifar, A. R., & Yazdani, A. (2015). A comparative study of multimodality in English and Persian spam letters of advertising. Journal of Modern Languages, 25, 1-34.
Kalliny, M., & Gentry, L. (2007). Cultural values reflected in Arab and American television advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 29(1), 15-32.
Kannan, R., & Tyagi, S. (2013). Use of language in advertisements. English for Specific Purposes World, 13(37), 1-9.
Kenechukwu, S. A., Asemah, E. S., & Edegoh, L.O.N. (2013). Behind advertising: The language of persuasion. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(4), 951 -959.
Khodabandeh, F. (2007). A contrastive analysis of rhetorical figures in English and Persian advertisements. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(2), 41-64.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mills, H. (2000). Artful persuasion: How to command attention, change minds, and influence people. AMACOM.
O’Shaughnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (2004). Persuasion in advertising. Routledge.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
Pishghadam, R., & Navari, S. (2012). A study into politeness strategies and politeness markers in advertisements as persuasive tools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 161-171.
Ray, L. M. & Batra, R. (1983). Emotion and persuasion in advertising: What we do and don't know about affect. Advances in Consumer Research, 10 (1), 543-548.
Shrum, L. J., Liu, M., Nespoli, M., & Lowrey, T. M. (2012). Persuasion in the marketplace: How theories of persuasion apply to marketing and advertising.  In J. Dillard, & L. Shen (eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. (2nd ed., pp. 314-331). Sage Publications.
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2006). Evaluation in text. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 4, 305- 312.
TV Line (2015). Ratings: NBC wins 2014-15 TV season; CBS is still most watched network. Retrieved from http://tvline.com/2015/05/20/ratings-nbc-wins-2014-2015-tv-season/
Wu, H. (2013). Appraisal perspective on attitudinal analysis of public service advertising discourse. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 55-66.
Yang, X., & Smith, R. E. (2009). Beyond attention effects: Modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Marketing Science, 28(5), 935-949.