Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

A Comparative Analysis of Heteroglossic Resources and Power Dynamics in the Trump vs. the United States Supreme Court Argument

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of English Language and Translation, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of English Language, College of Language Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
The present study examined the use of heteroglossic resources in courtroom oral arguments in a high-profile political case, using the Engagement system within the Appraisal model developed by Martin and White (2005). The discursive analysis of legal teams representing Donald Trump and the United States revealed that both teams employed the dialogically expansive formulations of entertain and attribute more frequently than the contractive resources of disclaim and proclaim. However, within the contractive category, disclaiming resources (deny and counter) were used more often than proclaiming resources (concur, pronounce, and endorse). Comparing the two teams, the United States legal team, represented by Dreeben, utilised more contractive resources overall, emphasising authority and rejection of opposing arguments, while Trump’s legal team, represented by Sauer, relied more on expansive resources to foster openness and flexibility. The frequent use of deny by both teams reflects their direct contestation of opposing claims, projecting confidence and control. Dreeben’s strategic combination of deny and counter provided a dynamic edge by acknowledging Sauer’s points before refuting them, subtly shifting the power dynamics in his favor. This study provides valuable insights into the strategic use of heteroglossic resources. Therefore, the study may contribute to understanding the rhetorical strategies used to incorporate multiple voices and perspectives in similar contexts, advancing knowledge in legal and linguistic studies.
Keywords
Subjects

Aisah, A., Saifullah, A., & Sudana, D. (2023, June). Applying appraisal analysis to the judges ‘considerations of the elements of hate speech in ITE law. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Entitled Language, Literary, And Cultural Studies, ICON LATERALS 2022, 05–06 November 2022, Malang, Indonesia.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Almayouf, M. A., & Alyousef, H. S. (2023). Exploring dialogism in newspaper articles by male and female writers: An analysis of Saudi women’s empowerment from the perspective of the engagement system of the appraisal theory. Journal of Research in Language & Translation, 3(2), 1-19.
Azhar, M. A., Afzal, M. I., Asif, S., & Mohsin, L. A. (2020). The critical discourse analysis of press release and conference in response to special court verdict: Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics approach. Harf-o-Sukhan, 4(2), 11-22.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
Bartley, L. V. (2020). ‘Please make your verdict speak the truth’: Insights from an Appraisal analysis of the closing arguments from a rape trial. Text & Talk40(4), 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2065
Cohen, H., & Alberstein, M. (2022). Power and persuasion in the courtroom: The force of law and the settlement dynamics of judges. Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, 6, 767.
Constitutional Accountability Center. (n.d.). Trump v. the United States. Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/
Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the OJ Simpson Trial. Palgrave.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dai, X., & Zhou, J. (2019, July). Analysis of criminal court discourse on Steven Avery case from the perspective of appraisal theory. In 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) (pp. 1917-1922). Atlantis Press.
Del Valle, J. (2000). Monoglossic policies for a heteroglossic culture: Misinterpreted multilingualism in modern Galicia. Language & Communication, 20(2), 105-132.
Dörnyei, Z., & Griffee, D. T. (2010). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Dudash, T. (2022). Analyzing legal argumentation: What theoretical model is the most comprehensive? Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 31(3), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.3.85-103
Etxabe, J. (2022). The dialogical language of law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 59, 429. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3783
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fryer, D. L. (2013). Exploring the dialogism of academic discourse: Heteroglossic Engagement in medical research articles. In G. Andersen and K. Bech (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genre (pp. 183–207). Brill.
Gaufman, E., & Ganesh, B. (2024). The Trump carnival: Populism, transgression and the far right. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111238135
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Jacquemet, M. (2000). John Conley & William O’Barr, Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Language in Society, 29(4), 594-596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500244047
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analysing qualitative data with MAXQDA (pp. 1-290).  Springer International Publishing. MAXQDA
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2021). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2).  Palgrave Macmillan.
Matoušková, B. (2020). Power manifestation in courtroom discourse: Lay witnesses and cross-examination (Doctoral dissertation, Masaryk University). 
Sangka, W. D. (2017). Appraisal theory of attitude in Michelle Obama speech towards presidential candidates of the United States 2016 (Bachelor’s thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Adabdan Humaniora).  
Song, W. (2020). A contrastive study of heteroglossia in the reasoning of criminal judgments of Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong. International Journal of English Linguistics10(5), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p131
Swigart, K. L., Anantharaman, A., Williamson, J. A., & Grandey, A. A. (2020). Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. Journal of Management46(6), 1063-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320909419
United States Supreme Court. (2023). Trump v. the United States, oral argument transcript, No. 23-939. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/23-939_3fb4.pdf
White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23, 259-284. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011
Yang, M., & Wang, M. (2021). A science mapping of studies on courtroom discourse with Cite Space. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 6(2), 291-322. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2021-2057