Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Comparing Native and Non-native English Language Writers’ Use of Reporting Verbs in Results and Discussion Sections of Research Papers

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
2 Department of English, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran
Abstract
Reporting verbs (RVs) have garnered considerable attention in corpus-based studies over the past few decades, owing to their essential role in establishing authors’ claims and positioning within academic discourse. The appropriate and accurate use of RVs is critical for conveying stance, argumentation, and attribution in scholarly writing. While RVs have been extensively examined, research specifically focusing on their use by native and non-native English-speaking writers in the Results and Discussion sections of scientific articles remains limited. The present study aimed to investigate the frequency and variation of RV usage among native and non-native English academic writers. To this end, a corpus comprising 200 research article excerpts—100 from each group—was compiled from the Results and Discussion sections of peer-reviewed scientific papers. The data were analyzed using the framework proposed by Thomas and Hawes (2002), which categorizes reporting verbs into three functional types: (a) empirical and real-world activity verbs, (b) discourse activity verbs, and (c) cognition verbs. The findings indicate that although both groups employed the same categories of reporting verbs, the frequency of usage varied significantly between native and non-native writers. These differences have important pedagogical implications, particularly for novice researchers across scientific disciplines, as they greater awareness of how reporting verbs contribute to effective academic argumentation and credible knowledge presentation.
Keywords
Subjects

Abdollahzadeh E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pragma.2010.07.019
Bloch, J. (2009). The design of an online concordance program for teaching about reporting verbs. Language Learning and Technology, 13(1), 59-78.
Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 310- 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
Clugston, M. F. (2008). An analysis of citation forms in health science journals. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 2, 11-22. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/54
Creswell, W. (2012). Education research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Docherty, P. (2019). An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry-level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes40, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.002
Doró, K. (2014). Citation practices in EFL undergraduate theses: A focus on reporting verbs. In J. Dombi, J. Horváth, & M. Nikolov (Eds.), UPRT 2013: Empirical Studies in English Applied Linguistics (pp. 32–42). Lingua Franca Csoport.
Flottum, K. (2012). Variation of stance and voice across cultures. In Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 218-231). Palgrave Macmillan.
Flowerdew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for specific purposes24(3), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.09.002
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused SLA: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention and the limited L2 Endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372-405). Routledge.
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E., (1996). Collins COBUILD grammar patterns 1: Verbs. Harper Collins
Gries, S. T. (2008). Corpus-based methods in analyses of second language acquisition data. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 406-431). Routledge
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341- 367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341.
 Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 1(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 2166(02)00035-8.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Liu, R., & Wang, S. (2019). How citation is signaled: A Corpus-based study on reporting verbs in Chinese academic papers. In H. Tao, H. H.-J. Chen (Eds.), Chinese for specific and professional purposes (pp. 53-71). Springer.
Loi, C. K. (2012) A corpus-based analysis: the use of citations. In: Conference proceeding International Conference: Innovative Research in a Changing and Challenging World, 16–18 May 2012, Phuket, Thailand.
Maggio, L. A., Meyer, H. S., & Artino, A. R. (2017). Beyond citation rates: a real-time impact analysis of health professions education research using altmetrics. Academic Medicine92(10), 1449-1455. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001897
Manan, N. A., & Noor, N. M. (2014). Analysis of reporting verbs in Master's theses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences134, 140-145. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.232
Oskueia, M. H. H. & Kuhi, D. (2014). The use of citations in academic writing: Analysis of introduction sections of Iranian and native English master’s theses. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, 2(3), 216-220.
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2019). What do citation count measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018. Scientometrics121(3), 1635-1684. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.04588
Tham, D. M., & Nhi, T.P. (2021).  A corpus-based study on reporting verbs used in TESOL research articles by native and non-native writers. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37, (3), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4729
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90012-4
Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied linguistics12(4), 365-382.
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365.
Wong, L. L. (2019). Implementing disciplinary data-driven learning for postgraduate thesis writing. Specialized English: New Directions in ESP and EAP Research and Practice.
Un-udom, S., & Un-udom, N. (2020). A corpus-based study on the use of reporting verbs in applied linguistics articles. English Language Teaching13(4), 162-169. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p162
Yeganeh, M. T., & Boghayeri, M. (2015). The frequency and function of reporting verbs in research articles written by native Persian and English speakers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 582-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.097
Yilmaz, M., & Erturk, Z. (2017). A contrastive corpus-based analysis of the use of reporting verbs by native and non-native ELT researchers. Novitas-ROYAL, 11(2), 112-127.
Zhang, X. (2008). A contrastive study of reporting in master’s theses in native Chinese and in native English. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.