Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

A Meta-Analysis of the Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Unlocking the trends and transformations in applied linguistics, this study presents an analysis of the research methodologies and theoretical orientations employed in 120 articles (16 issues) published in the esteemed Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research over its last four years (2020-2023). By studying a wide range of articles published in the aforementioned journal, this meta-analysis seeks to discover the dominant research methodologies and theoretical orientations, as well as their distribution across various subfields of applied linguistics and language research. Moreover, the contexts (EFL, ESL), instruments, participants, and the number of authors in each study are reviewed, with data presented in detailed tables and discussed. The results revealed the dominance of qualitative methodology (46%) over quantitative and mixed method research, the supremacy of sociocultural theoretical orientation (35%), the dominance of learners as participants (53%) in the studies, the prevalence of EFL context (88.33%) over ESL, and the power of questionnaire (21.67%) as an instrument over other instruments. The results of this meta-analysis provide a systematic mapping of current research trends and methodological approaches in the field, offering a foundation for future studies. By synthesizing existing findings, this study identifies patterns that can guide researchers and practitioners in selecting appropriate research designs and theoretical frameworks.
Keywords
Subjects

Abounegm, A., Askarbekuly, N., Magomedov, M., & Mazzara, M. (2023). Crowdsourcing for second language learning. In T. Ahram (Ed.), Human factors in software and systems engineering: AHFE (2023) International Conference. http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003773
Afshar, H. S., & Ranjbar, N. (2023). Mixed methods research in applied linguistics: The status quo of the current issues and practices. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121272
Alessandro, L., Douglas, G., Altman, J., Tetzlaff, C., Mulrow, P. C., Gøtzsche, J. P. A., Ioannidis, M., Clarke, M., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), 354-391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2017). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Aryal, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT in English language teaching-learning pedagogy. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 7, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1371/10.3126/jong.v7i1-2.70236
Arsyad, S. (2024). Arguments in the methods section of journal articles in English language education published in high-impact journals. Discourse and Interaction, 17(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2024-1-8
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge University Press.
Block, D. (2021). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
Brown, L., & Lee, S. (2017). Integrating technology into language teaching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 456-478.
Brown, C., & Williams, D. (2019). Meta-analysis as a tool for improving research quality in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(3), 345-367.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Marín-DÍaz, V., & Sampedro-Requena, B. E. (2016). Meta-analysis of research in e-learning published in Spanish journals. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0023-0
Chapelle, C. A. (2020). The role of technology in language learning. Language Teaching, 53(2), 131-152.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Chen, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). The effectiveness of computer-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(4–5), 345-367.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
 
Gautam, V., & Gautam, J. (2023). Qualitative research approaches in social sciences. In V. K. Gautam (Ed.), Recent applied research in humanities and social science (pp. 149–180). MKSES Publication. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10428693
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Sage Publications.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Emerging technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73443
Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org
Kepes, S., McDaniel, M. A., Brannick, M. T., & Banks, G. C. (2013). Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the Meta-Analytic Reporting Standards). Journal of Business Psychology, 28(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9300-2
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008).  Review of Complex systems and applied linguistics. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(2), 229–233.
McIvor, O. (2020). Indigenous language revitalization and applied linguistics: Parallel histories, shared futures? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000094
Meihami, H. (2020). A biographical narrative analysis of the challenges of applied linguists across different research abilities to conduct qualitative studies. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 39(1), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.37621.2846
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44, 412-446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12525
Page, M. J. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655-687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399
Prakash, M., Nadkarni, L., & Ohno-Machado, W. W. (2011). Natural language processing: An introduction. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1136/AMIAJNL-2011-000464
Rahman, M. A., Handrianto, C., Kenedi, A. K., Ilhami, A., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2024). Exploring the interplay between writing practices and identity formation in academic contexts. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, (2)(12), 838-848. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i12.238
Riazi, M., Ghanbar, H., & Fazel, I. (2020). The contexts, theoretical, and methodological orientation of EAP research: Evidence from empirical articles published in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100925
Riazi, M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the Journal of Second Language Writing at its 25th year (1992–2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.002
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Russo, M. W. (2007). How to review a meta-analysis? Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 3(8), 637-642. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21960873
Selvaraj, Vi. (2024). Interdisciplinary areas of research in applied linguistics. Journal of Oriental Studies, 2, 83-89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382621885_Interdisciplinary_Areas_of_Research_in_Applied_Linguistics
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2018). Enhancing research methodologies in applied linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 123-145.
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Sydorenko, T., Cárdenas-Claros, M., Huntley, L., & Montero Perez, M. (2024). Audiovisual input in language learning: Teacher’s perspectives. Language Learning & Technology,28(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73587
Torabi, M., & Fathi, M. (2021). A meta-analysis of the research methodologies of articles published in the “Social Capital Management” journal from 2014 to 2020. Social Capital Management, 9(2), 187–208. http://jscm.ut.ac.ir
Van Hell, J. G. (2023). The neurocognitive underpinnings of second language processing: Knowledge gains from the past and future outlook. Language Learning, 73(S2), 95–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12601
Zhao, S. (1991). Metatheory, metamethod, meta-data-analysis: What, why, and how? Sociological Perspectives, 34, 377-390. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389517