Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Challenges and the Role of AI Tools in Writing Development: A Corpus-Based and Pedagogical Analysis

Hemmati, Ali

doi:10.30470/irelc.2025.2078891.1038

Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Challenges and the Role of AI Tools in Writing Development: A Corpus-Based and Pedagogical Analysis

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Ali Hemmati

Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran

10.30470/irelc.2025.2078891.1038

Abstract

This study investigates the linguistic and rhetorical challenges EFL learners encounter in academic writing and examines how engagement with AI tools influences their drafting and revision processes. Anchored in cognitive, noticing-based, and sociocultural perspectives, the study combines a corpus-based analysis of 152 argumentative essay drafts with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings show consistent reductions in grammatical, lexical, and cohesion-related errors after AI-supported revision, with improvements becoming more evident over the semester. Learners’ initial drafts in the second writing cycle also contained fewer micro-level errors, suggesting partial internalization of patterns highlighted through repeated AI feedback. However, progress in higher-order features, particularly argument clarity and discourse organization, remained limited, indicating that current AI systems provide strong surface-level scaffolding but insufficient guidance for complex rhetorical development. Qualitative analyses further reveal that learners increasingly adopted selective and critical engagement with AI suggestions, balancing appreciation for enhanced accuracy and confidence with concerns about overreliance, authorship, and ethical boundaries. Together, these findings demonstrate that AI tools function as effective mediators of local linguistic accuracy but offer only partial support for deeper argumentative competence. The study underscores the need for pedagogical frameworks that integrate AI strategically with explicit instruction in rhetorical reasoning and responsible tool use to promote sustainable writing development.

Keywords

EFL Writing Development

AI-generated Feedback

Argumentative Essays

Corpus-based Analysis

Learners&rsquo

Perceptions

Subjects

ELT and Disciplinary Research

Anthony, L. (2023). AntConc (Version 4.0) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), Article 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v13n3p1

ElEbyary, K., Shabara, R., & Boraie, D. (2024). The differential role of AI-operated WCF in L2 students’ noticing of errors and its impact on writing scores. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00312-1

Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. http://103.203.175.90:81/fdScript/RootOfEBooks/E%20Book%20collection%20%202024%20%20G/ENGLISH/ferris_dana_r_treatment_of_error_in_second_language_student.pdf

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gustilo, L., Ong, E., & Lapinid, M. R. (2024). Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: Exploring educators’ practices, perceptions, and policies in the AI era. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam041/2003041957.pdf

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Second-Language-Writing-Ken-Hyland/dp/1108456413

Jaramillo, J. J., Chiappe, A., & Sáez-Delgado, F. (2025). From struggle to mastery: AI‑powered writing skills in ESL learners. Applied Sciences, 15(14), Article 8079. https://doi.org/10.339/app15148079

Jin, Y., Lin, T. J., & Lai, C. (2024). Modeling AI-assisted writing: How self-regulated learning influences writing outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108538

Kormos, J. (2023). The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000481

Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0

Lötscher, F., Trüb, R., Lohmann, J., Möller, J., Jansen, T., & Keller, S. D. (2025). Development of grammatical and lexical skills in argumentative EFL writing at upper secondary level in Germany and Switzerland. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1605658. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1605658

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Parra Núñez, R., Castrillo de Larreta-Azelain, M. D. (2025). The impact of using ChatGPT for feedback in EFL writing: a systematic review. Revista Internacional De Lenguas Extranjeras /International Journal of Foreign Languages, 23, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.17345/rile23.4221

Polakova, P., & Ivenz, T. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Shi, H., Chai, C. S., Zhou, S., & Aubrey, S. (2025). Comparing the effects of CHATGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541

Shousha, A., & Oraby, A. (2025). EFL teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s role in teaching English writing. English Language Teaching, 18(7), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v18n7p82

Teng, M. F. (2024). ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(4), 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Tran, T. T. T. (2025). Enhancing EFL writing revision practices: The impact of AI- and teacher-generated feedback and their sequences. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020232

Wan, R., Gebreegziabher, S., Li, T. J., & Badillo-Urquiola, K. (2024). CoCo matrix: Taxonomy of cognitive contributions in co-writing with intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the 16th Creativity & Cognition Conference (C&C’24’24). Chicago, IL, USA.

Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y

Zare, J., Al-Issa, A., & Madiseh, F. R. (2025). Interacting with ChatGPT in essay writing: A study of L2 learners’ task motivation. ReCALL, 37(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025000035

Zhang, Y. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class. Journal of Language Teaching, 4(4), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.024

Zou, B., Wang, C., He, H., Li, C., Purwanto, E., & Wang, P. (2025). Enhancing EFL writing with visualised GenAI feedback: A cognitive-affective theory of learning perspective on revision quality, emotional response, and human–computer interaction. Learning and Motivation, 91, Article 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102158