Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication

Divergent Realities: A Mixed-Methods Study of Language Beliefs Among English Teachers and Non-English Majors

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Languages, Arak University, Arak
Abstract
This mixed-methods study investigates disparities in language learning beliefs between English teachers and non-English major university students in Iran, examining their effects on classroom dynamics and learning outcomes. While teachers emphasize structured grammar instruction, communicative competence, and long-term proficiency, students prioritize fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary accumulation, and immediate practical application—reflecting tensions in Iran’s exam-oriented yet increasingly communicative EFL context. Despite extensive SLA research, few studies systematically explore teacher–student belief mismatches in non-Western settings. Grounded in Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and Dörnyei’s L2 Motivational Self System, this sequential explanatory mixed-methods study employed a 32-item Likert-scale questionnaire (N = 210; 120 teachers, 90 students) followed by six separate focus groups (three teacher-only, three student-only; 10 participants each) to contextualize quantitative findings. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests revealed significant divergences, with the three most pedagogically disruptive showing large effect sizes: students strongly endorsed vocabulary-focused learning (Item 14, U = 1840.00, p < .001, r = .63), feared early errors becoming permanent (Item 17, U = 2381.50, p < .001, r = .52), and relied heavily on L1 translation (Item 24, U = 3384.50, p < .001, r = .45). Qualitative data confirmed that lessons perceived as overly grammar- or fluency-driven without sufficient lexical support or strategic L1 use often provoked resistance, anxiety, and disengagement, highlighting epistemological divides and cognitive-contextual mismatches in beliefs, leading to tensions in fluency, error handling, digital integration, and cultural views, while advocating belief-negotiated pedagogies for reconciliation. Bridging these gaps via blended approaches like explicit vocabulary tasks, clear correction protocols, and calibrated technology use can boost motivation and efficacy in EFL settings, with future longitudinal and observational studies recommended to track dynamics.
Keywords
Subjects

Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Borg, S. (2019). Language teacher cognition: Perspectives and debates. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (Springer international handbooks of education, pp. 1149–1170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_59-2
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.41
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Foroozandeh, E., & Forouzani, M. (2015). Developing school English materials for the new Iranian educational system. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 59–73). British Council.
Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying Students Beliefs about Language Learning. In A. L. Wenden, & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119-129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of the EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130–150.
Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567701
Kern, R. G. (2008). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00771.x
Khatoony, S., & Nezhadmehr, M. (2020). EFL teachers’ challenges in integration of technology for online classrooms during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Iran. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol8.sp.1.202
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavi Moghaddam, S. B. (2020). New English for Schools series: Prospect & Vision. Ministry of Education of Iran.
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.
Lan, W., & Lam, R. (2020). Exploring an EFL teacher’s beliefs and practices in teaching topical debates in Mainland China. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 25–44.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How languages are learned (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Mercer, S. (2021). An agenda for well-being in ELT: An ecological perspective. ELT Journal, 75(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa062
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000325
Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00010-0
Peng, J.-E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System82, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
Razmjoo, S. A. (2006). Is communicative language teaching practical in the expanding circle? A case study of teachers of Shiraz high schools and institutes. Journal of Language and Learning, 4(2), 244–271.
Sakui, K., & Gaies, S. J. (1999). Investigating Japanese learners’ beliefs about language learning. System, 27(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00046-9 
Tafazoli, D., & Golshan, N. S. (2014). Technology-enhanced language learning tools in Iranian EFL context: Frequencies, attitudes and challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences136, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.299
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Woods, D., & Çakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.010
Yang, J. S., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behavior and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.11.1.201103.21
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Epilogue: Second language writing in the age of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.014
Zheng, X. (2016). Task-based language teaching in the Chinese EFL context: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research4(4), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss4.528